The Kingdom of Desmond Association

An historical society focused on royal, nobiliary and genealogical
aspects of this eminent part of Gaelic-Irish history:
The Kingdom of Desmond.

Councils, Clan Societies, Etc.



This organisation was started in 1991 to represent the hereditary Gaelic ‘chiefs-of-name’ then accepted and given courtesy recognition by the Office of Chief Herald of Ireland.

A constitution was promulgated and regular meetings were held, to include a reception and photo shoot with the then President of the Republic, Mary Robinson. The organisation started off with much support for having ‘revisited’ a part of the history of Ireland and its noble families which had often been neglected and misunderstood.

There did not appear initially to be any mechanism developed for recognition of new chiefs or claimants, as that process continued within the province of the Chief Herald’s office with the Standing Council accepting the decisions of the Chief Herald.  In 1999, a leading member and voice of the Council was exposed as fraudulent and that action caused obvious and severe embarrassment to the  Council. Then some others previously ‘certified’ by the process of ‘courtesy recognition’ had their claims disputed as well in a very public manner. And then in 2003 the Office of Chief Herald was stripped of the right to grant ‘courtesy recognitions’ altogether, judged as never having had that legal right in the first place (from 1944).  This was a correct judgement in that the Irish Republic was and is a ‘successor’ state to Gaelic order governments and had and has no right to legislate about customs/laws of previous governments.

However, the demise of the ‘courtesy recognition’ system has thus created a situation where there is in effect no authority other than the Standing Council of Irish Chiefs to pass on applications for membership to the Council (it previously – contrary to reason – accepted the ‘listing’ of a chief by the Chief Herald as permission to admit a person to membership)! Nevertheless re past practices, the Council represents continuity of law and custom as existed when there was de-facto Gaelic rule,

Having said that, this is not to say that the Standing Council has the right to determine processes which belong to each and every Irish chiefly family in regard to their rules for succession. But given the absence of any other overall authority, the Council could validate that successions are correct in terms of accepted descent rules. And thus be a ‘registry’ for successions of individual families, though again the Council has no rights over the successions.  It is NOT an approval authority but can be a registry, and can also foster interactions beneficial to Irish culture, etc. among its members and their clans/septs.

There has been criticism of the Council for not really having acted as regards anything (or anything much) since the Terence affair of 1999. It is gaining a negative reputation as a result of its inaction, and that is unfortunate. It also appears that the Council has not accepted the 2003 government edict and decison cancelling  the policy of 'courtesy recognition', and still refuses to take responsibility for its own admissions.

For example, several people (to our knowledge) have applied for admission to the Council (as far back as 2001),  but no actions have been taken, again probably relating to the fact that no procedures for validation were set up and/or no actions have been taken deliberately. As of now, therefore, it still appears that nothing has been promulgated in terms of any procedures one should employ to make application, have his proofs studied, etc.  The new MacCarthy Mor made an inquiry along these lines on 1 September 2011 and was told that there will be no further admissions until a new 'convenant' is worked out with the current Irish government. In effect this means that the SCICC will admit no one without a return to the pre-2003 policy whereby the Office of Chief Herald was the 'approving' authority for admissions to the SCICC! Most do not think that there will ever be a return to that policy on the part of any Irish government, given the very public governmental total rejection of the policy with the admission that it was never correct or legal in the first place!  Based on the reply of the SCICC and the information it provided, the MacCarthy Mor declined to file a petition for admission. Most people continue to urge the SCICC to take responsibility for its own admissions. Update, July 2012: we have had replies from the Chief Herald of Ireland and the Director of the National Library (to whom the Chief Herald reports) that in no way is there to be any initiative to restore the discredited 'Courtesy Recognition' policy which was eliminated in 2003. This would indicate even more strongly that the SCICC should take 'responsibility' for its own admissions!

There is some information about the Standing Council on the internet, but the Council does not maintain its own website.

This Association applauds the creation of the Standing Council of Irish Chiefs. The Standing Council is certainly now the only proper agency for the work of preserving the grouping of the hereditary chiefs of Gaelic names in an organised and communal form (and indeed the Irish chiefs of non-Gaelic families which became ‘gaelicised’ and are not now part of the Council’s agenda, but could be if the Standing Council so wishes at some stage). We applaud the sponsorship of the Standing Council of an annual prize for Gaelic studies and its other initiatives.

A new and updated official pronouncement on the Council’s own system of approvals or disapprovals of applicants would seem to be in order, based on the exit of the government from the 'courtesy recognition' business in 2003. The 'twilight zone' existing since 1999 and particularly since 2003 has served only to cause public polemics, with charges flowing back and forth among claimants to chiefships and their critics. This benefits no one and the Council should exercise leadership as regards to solving these scandalous problems.

♦ ♦ ♦  


This organisation was founded with help from the Irish government, in 1989. The man who claimed the styling of O Connor Kerry was a leading participant in its organisation.

Its purpose was and is to assist in the organisation of Irish families into recognisable ‘clans’, headed by an elected honourary chief (where an hereditary chief does not exist, which is the case for the overwhelming majority of families). 

Clans of Ireland has been successful. Yes, the initial interest by the government involved the realisation that increased tourism would be a beneficial result of organising Irish families. The Scottish experience along the same lines was a shining example of the benefits gained by a country  having ‘clans’ and clan gatherings, etc.

But beyond ‘tourism’, the organisation has provided service in not only helping with family communications via ‘grouping’ under the common surname, but in also assisting in many other areas: genealogy, public lectures, publicity for clan events, coordination of numerous requests for everything from area maps to finding speakers for visiting groups. The organisation does not in any way enter into the area of approving/judging any hereditary claims and as such is not engaged in any genealogical research (but helps people searching for their roots by putting them in contact with people of similar name known to Clans of Ireland, or by providing lists of reputable genealogists who are members of the professional society of such in Ireland). 

The organisation has an elected Board of Directors, with rotating elections so as to ensure fresh views along with continuity of leadership. And Clans of Ireland has never been inward-looking. It from its foundation accepts all septs or clans which have Irish roots, and wish to be represented as members of Clans of Ireland (having shown only that the leadership represents the initiative of a group of a family name to begin with). In short, it is not open to just families with Gaelic names, but to all irrespective of the origin of the root of the family: those of Norman-Irish heritage whose families go back prior to 1600 in Ireland; those of Anglo-Irish (new English) ancestry; Norse, English, Gallowglass, any others (Palatine, Huguenot, etc.) with historic presence in Ireland. Thus it is for all Irish families, for all those who are Irish by their history and/or family choice.

Clans of Ireland, Ltd maintains a very public website, is responsive to all inquiries, and publishes a list of its clan members and governing board. It also has an Order of Merit and each year deserving people who have served Irish cultural history are admitted as 'companions'.

The organisation makes a real contribution to helping others to be cultural custodians of their own family histories. Clans of Ireland  works with the Standing Council of Irish Chiefs; and a few members of the latter support their ‘clan’ activities within Clans of Ireland, and indeed have participated in events sponsored by Clans of Ireland.

♦ ♦ ♦  


(Titles Emanating from the British Crown)

Here we see an organisation ‘regulating’ its own affairs and passing on successions without public polemics. As the Standing Council of Irish Chiefs, it is a private grouping which can regulate its own successions within its own rules and the specifications of the original patents of its members/U.K. common law, calling on genealogists or others for help only as the association sees necessary. 

The Irish Peers Association stemmed from the 1922-23 Treaty/Acts between the ‘U.K.’ and the then unrecognised government of a free Ireland, creating an ‘Irish Free State’. Previously, 28 ‘representative peers’ of Ireland sat in the Parliament of the U.K. on a life- elected basis. That ceased with Irish independence, with no further appointments being made on the death of a ‘representative peer’, the last of whom died in 1961.

The I.P. Association is private and maintains no public website. It is composed of all those who hold peerages of Ireland as granted by a British government in one of its personalities (England, Great Britain, United Kingdom). These individuals now play no role whatsoever in the affairs of the U.K., except those Irish Peers who also hold a U.K. peerage (and thus can or could prior to recent legislation sit in the House of Lords of the U.K. of Great Britain and Northern Ireland).

It should be noted that the I.P. Association does not include people who hold ‘feudal’ titles, most awarded by palatine lords (such as deCourcey of Ulster, deLacy, Butler, Fitzgerald) to their subordinates; many of these titles were and are legitimate historically as used within Ireland while under British rule and some of which are secondary holdings (of whatever legal form) by members of the I.P. Association. Many of these titles have long history on their side and  were often referred to in British historical documents, e.g. ‘Baron of Galtrim’, or ‘Baron of Loughmoe’, ‘Knight of Glin’, etc. but were never officially listed or published by a British government. This is a somewhat confusing area as to what is real and what is ‘assumed’, and some of these titles have been ‘sold’ on the open market - creating some adverse commentary. This is only mentioned in passing as it is not any business of the Kingdom of Desmond Association; at the end of the day is a matter for the government of the U.K. and the Irish Peers Association.

Among the members of the I.P. Association are a significant number of people of Norman-Irish ancestry (e.g. Plunkett, Nugent, Barnewall, Bourke, Butler, Dillon, Bellew, Fitzgerald, Roche, Talbot, deCourcey) and a few of Gaelic origins (McDonnell, O Brien, Macdonald). A number are Irish citizens, living in Ireland and carrying Irish passports.  At this writing there are approximately 60 ‘Irish Peers’ who have only the ‘Irish’ peerage and any subordinate possessions part of their Irish peerage.

Then there are perhaps an additional 60 or so persons who have Irish titles but who also have UK titles and as said earlier can sit in the House of Lords of the U.K. (prior to recent legislation in any case). For example, there has been an Earl of Kildare (Fitzgerald) since 1316 in the Irish Peerage, but the current incumbent can sit in the U.K. House of Lords only based on a U.K. barony granted in 1870.

The I.P. Association is an example of private citizens keeping alive their historical traditions, yea indeed being ‘cultural custodians’ of their family descents.  And it should be said that some within its membership are often very active in the life of the Republic, a number having served in public posts and many being actively involved in Irish cultural and intellectual life ....  with much diversity: from interests in astronomy to tours of old castles to publishing and, yes, even to sponsoring rock concerts!

The Association of the Kingdom of Desmond again stresses the welcome to participation for all those of the Irish Peers Association whose titles/families refer to places in what was the Kingdom of Desmond.  These would include those holding the Irish peerage titles of Castlemaine, of Carbery, of Muskerry, of Doneraile, of Fermoy, of Kingsale, and of Ventry, none of whom also hold a separate U.K. peerage (this listing may not be totally correct as of this writing and any corrections are welcomed).